# Node RED vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Node RED | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 23 790 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Node RED scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Node RED is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Node RED](https://selfhost.directory/project/node-red) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/node-red.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/node-red-vs-uusec-waf