# nocodb vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 65 370 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +316 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-workout-cool