# nocodb vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-wildbox