# nocodb vs Whirl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | Whirl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 65 377 ✓ | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [Whirl](https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-whirl