# nocodb vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 ✓ | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | +772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 81/100 for nocodb, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-umami