nocodbvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 65 372 | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 13 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 81/100 for nocodb, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with