nocodbvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 65 380 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with