# nocodb vs TraceRoot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | TraceRoot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 ✓ | 1 102 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TraceRoot.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [TraceRoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-traceroot