nocodbvsToolbarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Toolbarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #5 of 6 in Administration |
| GitHub stars | 65 377 | 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 39/100 for Toolbarr, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Toolbarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Toolbarr is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Toolbarr details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Toolbarr, compare it with