# nocodb vs storj

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | storj |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 65 377 ✓ | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-storj