nocodbvsrustypaste
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | rustypaste | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #32 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 | 1 214 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.18.1 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 56/100 for rustypaste, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for rustypaste.
If you want the quickest setup, rustypaste is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →rustypaste details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep rustypaste, compare it with