# nocodb vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-rudderstack