# nocodb vs RSS Guard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | RSS Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 ✓ | 2 817 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 ✓ | +56 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 64/100 for RSS Guard, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [RSS Guard](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-rss-guard