# nocodb vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 65 377 ✓ | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-qm-music