# nocodb vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 379 ✓ | 20 028 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +317 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-qinglong