# nocodb vs PruneMate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | PruneMate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 ✓ | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.

If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [PruneMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-prunemate