# nocodb vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 ✓ | 61 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | +1 489 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 81/100 for nocodb, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)
- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-penpot