# nocodb vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocodb | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 372 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocodb-vs-openreader