nocodbvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 370 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +316 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with