nocobasevsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocobase | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 24 769 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +423 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocobase scores 78/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
nocobase is growing faster right now (+423 stars in 30 days).
nocobase details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep nocobase, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with