# nocobase vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 760 ✓ | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +426 | +491 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Wazuh scores 80/100 against 78/100 for nocobase, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-wazuh