# nocobase vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 24 761 | 39 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | +772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 78/100 for nocobase, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; nocobase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-umami