# nocobase vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 775 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +429 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.2.36 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+429 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-trip2g