# nocobase vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 24 762 | 117 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 | +5 569 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 78/100 for nocobase, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-tradingagents