# nocobase vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 774 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.2.36 · 29 Oct 2026 | v2.7.25 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for subarr.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-subarr