# nocobase vs self-hosted-livesync-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | self-hosted-livesync-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 760 ✓ | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +426 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+426 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-self-hosted-livesync-server