# nocobase vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 755 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +421 ✓ | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+421 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-readmeabook