# nocobase vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 24 771 ✓ | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +425 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.2.36 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; nocobase needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+425 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-qm-music