# nocobase vs openHop Repeater

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nocobase | openHop Repeater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 24 764 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +418 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+418 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)
- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nocobase-vs-openhop-repeater