# Nightingale vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nightingale | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 522 | 40 373 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +138 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

Nightingale ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nightingale-vs-photoprism