# Nightingale vs OpenList

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nightingale | OpenList |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 522 | 25 326 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +568 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenList scores 80/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

OpenList is growing faster right now (+568 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)
- [OpenList](https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nightingale-vs-openlist