Nightingalevsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nightingale | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 522 | 393 312 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 888 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
Nightingale details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Nightingale, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with