NGINXvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NGINX | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 31 998 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-1.31.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
NGINX scores 84/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
NGINX ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, NGINX is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
NGINX is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
NGINX details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep NGINX, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with