# Nezha vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nezha | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 379 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Nezha scores 72/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Nezha ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, Nezha is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Nezha is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nezha](https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nezha-vs-uncompressed