NezhavsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nezha | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 378 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nezha and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Nezha ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Nezha is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Nezha details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Nezha, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with