Nextcloudvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nextcloud | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 37 322 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v33.0.10 · 15 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nextcloud scores 86/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
Nextcloud ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Nextcloud needs more configuration.
Nextcloud is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).
Nextcloud details →transfer.sh details →