# Nextcloud Memories vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nextcloud Memories | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in Photo Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 867 | 15 908 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nextcloud Memories and transfer.sh score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Nextcloud Memories ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Nextcloud Memories needs more configuration.

Nextcloud Memories is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nextcloud Memories](https://selfhost.directory/project/nextcloud-memories) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nextcloud-memories.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nextcloud-memories-vs-transfersh