Nextcloud Memoriesvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nextcloud Memories | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in Photo Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 867 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nextcloud Memories and transfer.sh score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Nextcloud Memories ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Nextcloud Memories needs more configuration.
Nextcloud Memories is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Nextcloud Memories details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Nextcloud Memories, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with