# Nextcloud Memories vs qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nextcloud Memories | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 3 867 ✓ | 1 760 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | v10.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Nextcloud Memories scores 69/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Nextcloud Memories.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Nextcloud Memories needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Nextcloud Memories](https://selfhost.directory/project/nextcloud-memories) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nextcloud-memories.md)
- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nextcloud-memories-vs-qbittorrent-linuxserverio