# NextChat vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NextChat | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 125 in AI | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 88 907 ✓ | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

NextChat scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, NextChat is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

NextChat is growing faster right now (+95 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [NextChat](https://selfhost.directory/project/nextchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nextchat.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

## Related comparisons

- [LibreChat vs NextChat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/librechat-vs-nextchat)
- [NextChat vs openhands](https://selfhost.directory/compare/nextchat-vs-openhands)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nextchat-vs-zookeeper