# netxms vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netxms | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 417 | 56 879 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +150 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | release-6.2.4 · 2 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 55/100 for netxms, so it is the safer default.

netxms ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; netxms needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netxms](https://selfhost.directory/project/netxms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netxms.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netxms-vs-typst