# netxms vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netxms | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 417 | 93 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 144 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-6.2.4 · 2 Sept 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 55/100 for netxms, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for netxms.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; netxms needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netxms](https://selfhost.directory/project/netxms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netxms.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netxms-vs-omnivoice-studio