# NetworkOptimizer vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NetworkOptimizer | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 1 215 | 24 059 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +781 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.10.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C# | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.

NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, NetworkOptimizer is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [NetworkOptimizer](https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/networkoptimizer.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/networkoptimizer-vs-temporal