# netdata vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netdata | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 81 208 ✓ | 15 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +561 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+561 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netdata-vs-zigbee2mqtt