# netdata vs Zealot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netdata | Zealot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 81 211 ✓ | 1 368 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Zealot.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; Zealot needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)
- [Zealot](https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netdata-vs-zealot