# netdata vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netdata | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 81 200 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +566 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+566 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netdata-vs-woodpecker-ci