# netdata vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netdata | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 81 215 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +568 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+568 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netdata-vs-trip2g