# netdata vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | netdata | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 81 200 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +566 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/netdata-vs-tradingagents