# Navidrome Music Server vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Navidrome Music Server | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 24 420 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/navidrome-music-server-vs-tube-archivist