# Navidrome Music Server vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Navidrome Music Server | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 24 414 ✓ | 1 364 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +656 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+656 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/navidrome-music-server-vs-tapflow